I responded to Hannah's blog
'Change of Mind: Real Love.' Hannah wrote about her changing opinion concerning
love, after comparing the film Once,
and other films she’s grown up watching like The Notebook and Dear John.
Dear Hanz,
I also
have had a shift in my opinion of ‘love’ recently, similar to yours after watching
Once. To be totally honest, I love love love love Nicholas Sparks movies. In case you didn’t realized, ABC
family played The Notebook, The Time Traveler’s Wife, A Walk to Remember, and Leap Year all back to back Saturday and
Sunday. I was devastated to realize I wouldn’t be able to sit on my couch
having a movie marathon, due to studying for AP test and other homework. While
I did manage to catch the end of The Time
Traveler’s Wife, I watched it with a different perspective than when I have
first seen it, as a hopeless romantic in 8th grade. I’d still call
myself a hopeless romantic, but what I find romantic is far different.
In the
two years that had passed between that original viewing and now, I’ve been
exposed to more ‘real’ love. Entering high school, it’s hard not to have your
views changed when there are teenagers hooking up left and right. Is that love?
It’s surely a physical expression of it, but which is more important? The
physical or the emotional side?
What all
of the crazy love story movies have in contact is a lot of physical contact. After
all, most of them are just a bunch of bad acting, which ruins the emotional
aspect of the story, with a lot of special effects, kissing/sex, and staring
into each other’s eyes to distract us from what love should actually be. Let’s
face it: the couple that’s gushy all the time is downright annoying. I’ve seen many
relationships that are far more stable than Ally and Noah’s, or Henry and Clare’s.
Those are the couples that spend hours talking, can adapt from hanging out with
friends to a date night, and make each other laugh. And they’re often normal
teenagers, who get stressed and have bad hair days and lots and lots of flaws.
I think
there’s a saying somewhere that falling in love means loving another person flaws.
Characters in movies rarely have flaws, or
at least not ‘real’ ones. They’re perfect, but I know that when I fall in love
I will be nowhere close to perfection. I hope that there’s someone out there
willing to accept that, and help me get a little closer.
Did I
still record a bunch of those sappy movies to watch next weekend? Of course. But
more of the fact that I love watching them with my friends and I wish I had
Rachel McAdams’s hair versus wishing for a love story like the one on screen. So,
movie night after the AP? I still think the academy guys would benefit greatly
from watching The Notebook.
Much love,
Charlie
I also thoroughly enjoyed Derek’s
blog ‘It Matters: Groupthink and the GOP’. He wrote about the zigzagging GOP
campaign and the rationale behind it: we all follow the crowd.
Dear Derek,
We’re in
high school, another perfect example of the concept you describe in the above
blog post. In my two years of high school, we’ve already seen crazy fashion
trends come and go, no matter how bad they actually look when everyone starts
wearing it, most of us teenagers feel the need to conform as well. In the movie
Mean Girls, a prank is played on
queen bee Regina George, to have two holes cut into her shirt. Instead of being
ridiculed for having holes in her
shirt, all of the other girls cut holes in their shirt and it becomes the
latest fashion trend.
Whether
it be fashion trends or presidential candidates, if something is getting
attention we hold it in higher esteem regardless of its face value. In fact, I’ve
seen your theory about endorsements in action. On Election Day a few years ago,
I remember asking my mother who she was voting for. She was informed about the
major elections like for President, Vice President, etc. but for lower level
positions, like new judges for Cook Country; she said she was simply voting for
whoever the Chicago Tribune was backing.
Now while I was far less informed
than her about voting, safe with the knowledge that it wouldn’t be my
responsibility as a citizen for a couple more years, I was still curious if that
was an accurate way to vote. My mom is still far more politically active than
the majority of the population, she often writes to politicians with her
opinions, which leads me to think: what about everyone else? When the rest of
Illinois and the U.S. votes, do they know what exactly they’re voting for, or
are they just voting for whoever is flashiest?
I don’t
think that’s an accurate way to govern a country, but perhaps like Mitt Romney,
it was inevitable. Informed citizens can only hope that the top-level media is
getting the facts right concerning candidates’ platforms and accurately
informing the voting population instead of being influence by donations and
super PACs.
Derek, your
prediction was accurate. There were still some highs and lows, but three months
later Romney is the GOP candidate still standing. Best of luck to him and
current President Barak Obama on the long road to November.
Inevitably,
Charlie
No comments:
Post a Comment