Immediately, I was thrust into a brand new experi
To put it plainly, Shakespeare scared me. It set a bar I would never be able to hit, yet alone surpass. As the class dug deeper and deeper into the book, all of my 'surface level' comprehension never seemed adequate. I'm too literal of a person to have things like how the syllables affect the meaning' stand out to me at first, second, or third glance. Reading R&J became a chore, and I felt that if I focused on the writing, it would trade off with my understanding of the story, and vice versa: I couldn't find a balance.
I began to focus on what I could understand easily, like identifying figurative language, while still understanding the gist of Romeo and Juliet's antics. By easing myself into the insanity, it became easier to handle. I plan to carry this plan into King Lear, by understanding the plot first, then what I can easily understand about the language, and finally work into harder, more complex ideas that have disappeared between Elizabethan time and now.
I also hope to use this in my writing - laying out a plan, and then making lots of revisions to add little quirks for further generations, or future teachers, to discover. All in all, my singular experience with Shakespeare with Romeo and Juliet was one of learning! I liked discovering all of the patterns and things that can be done with language, it just took some getting used too. It's a break from the status quo, but in the blur of high school, sometimes that's whats needed.
Charlie, I completely agree that any Shakespeare work is incredibly intimidating at first sight. Even for someone who can comprehend the majority of the language, the idioms and metaphors in the work make it seem like an utterly foreign language. When one says that have a surface level comprehension of Shakespeare's works, what they are indeed saying is that they cannot even understand that. Some of the surface-level ideas in Shakespeare plays can only be seen by looking at some hidden themes that appear at different times in the text. It seems that Shakespeare expected the general population to catch onto the ideas that he had hidden in the text. However, I think that Shakespeare overestimated the analytical abilities of the general population. Shakespeare’s mind was astoundingly rich, and I think he had trouble with understanding how the common folk couldn’t see the world like he did. Rather, they couldn’t see the depth he did at first glance. Through rigorous analysis, people can understand Shakespeare’s works in all their poetic profundity.
ReplyDelete